Custombilt Firearms Manufacturing, L.L.C. v. United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
| United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives |
| Custombilt Firearms Manufacturing, L.L.C. doing business as Bullet Hole Custombilt Firearms Manufacturing, The |
| 2:2023cv02318 |
| July 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kenneth G Gale |
| Brooks G Severson |
| Kathryn H Vratil |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Honorable Brooks G. Severson for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale no longer assigned to case. Signed by deputy clerk on 8/21/23. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.)(kao) |
| Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Custombilt Firearms Manufacturing, L.L.C. - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Sutton, Jeffery) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Custombilt Firearms Manufacturing, L.L.C. (Sutton, Jeffery) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6109675.), filed by Custombilt Firearms Manufacturing, L.L.C. (Sutton, Jeffery) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Kathryn H. Vratil and Magistrate Judge Kenneth G. Gale for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (jk) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Designation of place of trial is missing. The filing party/attorney is directed to correct the deficiency immediately. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Custombilt Firearms Manufacturing, L.L.C. v. United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Custombilt Firearms Manufacturing, L.L.C. doing business as Bullet Hole Custombilt Firearms Manufacturing, The | |
| Represented By: | Jeffery A. Sutton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
