Medina v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
| Ruben Medina, Jr. |
| Social Security Administration, Commissioner of |
| Social Security Administration - Office of General Counsel |
| 2:2023cv02349 |
| August 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Daniel D Crabtree |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Jessica Milano on behalf of Social Security Administration, Commissioner of. (Milano, Jessica) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Ruben Medina, Jr. (Sciolaro, Kyle) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT - SOCIAL SECURITY with trial location of Kansas City. (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6124065.) Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Fed. R. Civ. P. Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions, the Notice of Electronic Filing for this Complaint has been transmitted to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Kansas, as well as the Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel, filed by Ruben Medina, Jr. (Sciolaro, Kyle) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) Social Security Administrative Record due 10/10/2023. (nao) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
