Burnett v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
| Gary D. Burnett |
| Auto-Owners Insurance Company and Auto-Owners (Mutual) Insurance Company |
| 2:2023cv02375 |
| August 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Daniel D Crabtree |
| Teresa J James |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Auto-Owners (Mutual) Insurance Company identifying none as corporate parent (Mackay, Derek) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #5 Amended Complaint by Auto-Owners (Mutual) Insurance Company. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit A)(Mackay, Derek) Modified filing party on 10/26/2023 (msb). |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Auto-Owners (Mutual) Insurance Company (Attachment: #1 Exhibit A)(Mackay, Derek) Modified Filing party on 10/26/2023 (msb). |
| Filing 9 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Mark W. Schmitz on behalf of Auto-Owners (Mutual) Insurance Company (Schmitz, Mark) |
| Filing 8 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Derek H. Mackay on behalf of Auto-Owners (Mutual) Insurance Company (Mackay, Derek) |
| Filing 7 RETURN OF SERVICE of Auto-Owners Mutual filed by Plaintiff Gary D. Burnett (Buckley, Brendan) |
Filing 6
ORDER ON RESPONSE TO SHOW CAUSE ORDER. The court concludes plaintiff has shown good cause why the court shouldn't dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 9/22/2023. (ca)
|
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Auto-Owners (Mutual) Insurance Company, filed by Gary D. Burnett.(Buckley, Brendan) Modified party on 10/26/2023 (msb). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED UNEXECUTED by Gary D. Burnett as to Auto-Owners Insurance Company. (Buckley, Brendan) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Auto-Owners (Mutual) Insurance Company (issued to Attorney for service). Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge Form provided to counsel for service with complaint. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (jk) |
|
Filing 3
NOTICE AND ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff Gary D. Burnett is directed to show cause within fourteen days why the court should not dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332. Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 9/6/2023. (mam)
|
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Gary D. Burnett. (Buckley, Brendan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6141376.), filed by Gary D. Burnett. (Buckley, Brendan) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Auto-Owners Insurance Company (issued to Attorney for service). Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge Form provided to counsel for service with complaint. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (jsh) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree and Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (jsh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
