Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Walmart Inc.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
Walmart Inc. |
2:2023cv02395 |
September 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Toby Crouse |
Teresa J James |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Walmart Inc. waiver sent on 9/29/2023, answer due 11/28/2023. (Lowe Stiles, Megan) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Lowe Stiles, Megan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City, filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.(Lowe Stiles, Megan) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Toby Crouse and Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (nac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.