Yu v. UMB Bank, N.A. et al
Howard Yu |
UMB Bank, N.A., Colliers Securities, LLC and Colliers Mortgage, LLC |
2:2023cv02441 |
September 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Gwynne E Birzer |
Daniel D Crabtree |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 ANSWER to #17 Second Amended Complaint AND COUNTERCLAIM against Howard Yu by UMB Bank, N.A. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List Exhibit Index, #2 Exhibit A - Guaranty Agreement, #3 Exhibit B - Hotel Project Rendering, #4 Exhibit C-1 - Development Agreement, #5 Exhibit C-2 - First Amendment to Development Agreement, #6 Exhibit D - Assignment of Development Agreement, #7 Exhibit E - TGT Trust Indenture, #8 Exhibit F - Project Fund Written Requests, #9 Exhibit G - Minnesota TIP Order, #10 Exhibit H - October 14, 2021 Demand for Payment) (Holzhueter, Kersten) |
Filing 18 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 11/24/2023 for Defendant UMB Bank, N.A. to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 11/06/2023. (nac) |
Filing 17 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT for Damages against UMB Bank, N.A., filed by Howard Yu. (Loehr, Ryan) |
Filing 16 ORDER. The Court reviewed Plaintiff's Response to the Court's October 5, 2023, Show Cause Order ("Motion"), which also includes a request for leave to file a second amended complaint. (ECF No. 11). Defendant UMB Bank, N.A., has now filed its response to Plaintiff's Motion (ECF No. 15) and indicates it has no objection to Plaintiff's request for leave to file a second amended complaint. Therefore, the Court finds good cause exists, and Plaintiff's Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file his second amended complaint on or before 10/31/23. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 10/25/23. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (spa) |
Filing 15 RESPONSE by Defendant UMB Bank, N.A. re #11 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. (Holzhueter, Kersten) |
Filing 14 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by UMB Bank, N.A. identifying UMB Financial Corporation as corporate parent. (Holzhueter, Kersten) |
Filing 13 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Blake Douglas Smith on behalf of UMB Bank, N.A. (Smith, Blake) |
Filing 12 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Kersten L. Holzhueter on behalf of UMB Bank, N.A. (Holzhueter, Kersten) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint re #3 Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Howard Yu. (Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer.) (Attachment: #1 Exhibit 1 - Proposed Amended Complaint) [Note: This is a refiling of docket entry #9 which was filed in error as a two-part document containing both a Response and a Motion. This refiling is for administrative purposes only.] (kao) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE of Colliers Defendants by Howard Yu. (Loehr, Ryan) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE re #5 Order to Show Cause by Plaintiff Howard Yu. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Second Amended Complaint)(Loehr, Ryan) (Two part filing made in error - see #11 concerning the Motion portion of this entry.) (kao) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal Service by Howard Yu upon Colliers Mortgage, LLC served on 10/10/2023, answer due 10/31/2023. (Loehr, Ryan) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal Service by Howard Yu upon Colliers Securities, LLC served on 10/10/2023, answer due 10/31/2023. (Loehr, Ryan) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Personal Service by Howard Yu upon UMB Bank, N.A. served on 10/6/2023, answer due 10/27/2023. (Loehr, Ryan) |
Filing 5 NOTICE AND ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff is directed to show cause within 14 days from this Order's date why the court should not dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332. Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 10/5/2023. (ca) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Colliers Mortgage, LLC, Colliers Securities, LLC, UMB Bank, N.A. (issued to Attorney for service) Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge Form provided to counsel for service with complaint. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (nac) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree and Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (nac) |
Filing 4 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Howard Yu - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Loehr, Ryan) |
Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT for Damages against Colliers Mortgage, LLC, Colliers Securities, LLC, UMB Bank, N.A., filed by Howard Yu. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3) (Loehr, Ryan) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City (Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6165148.), filed by Howard Yu. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3) (Loehr, Ryan) |
Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Howard Yu. (Loehr, Ryan) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/29/2023: #1 Completed Civil Cover Sheet) (nac). Modified on 9/29/2023 to add completed civil cover sheet (nac). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.