Peters v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
Matthew Peters |
Prudential Insurance Company of America |
2:2023cv02511 |
November 15, 2023 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas |
Gwynne E Birzer |
Eric F Melgren |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint And Affirmative And Additional Defenses To Plaintiff's Complaint by Prudential Insurance Company of America.(McFarland, Mark) |
Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Prudential Insurance Company of America identifying Prudential Financial Inc. as corporate parent (McFarland, Mark) |
![]() |
Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant Prudential Insurance Company of America (referred to Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer) (McFarland, Mark) |
Filing 5 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 12/25/2023 for Defendant Prudential Insurance Company of America to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 11/6/2023. (jsh) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail by Matthew Peters upon Prudential Insurance Company of America served on 11/20/2023, answer due 12/11/2023 (Pearce, Derrick) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Matthew Peters. (Pearce, Derrick) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $402, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6203531.), filed by Matthew Peters.(Pearce, Derrick) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to Chief District Judge Eric F. Melgren and Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (nac) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Prudential Insurance Company of America. (issued to Attorney for service) Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge Form provided to counsel for service with complaint. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (nac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Peters v. Prudential Insurance Company of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Matthew Peters | |
Represented By: | Derrick A. Pearce |
Represented By: | Kyle Henry Sciolaro |
Represented By: | Paul Joseph Taylor |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Prudential Insurance Company of America | |
Represented By: | Mark E. McFarland |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.