Malla v. Walgreen, Co.
Mandy Malla |
WALGREEN, CO. |
2:2023cv02542 |
December 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Toby Crouse |
Angel D Mitchell |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Madeline Nebel on behalf of Walgreen, Co. (Nebel, Madeline) |
Filing 6 INITIAL ORDER REGARDING PLANNING AND SCHEDULING: Scheduling Conference set for 3/21/2024 at 10:00 AM by Telephone ADM - CONFERENCE LINE 1-888-363-4749 ACCESS CODE 3977627 before Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell. Rule 26 Planning Conference Deadline 2/29/2024. Rule 26 Initial Disclosures Deadline set for 3/11/2024. Proposed Scheduling Order Deadline 3/11/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell on 1/23/2024. (kas) |
Filing 5 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Walgreen, Co..(Bunck, Stacy) |
Filing 4 CLERKS ORDER EXTENDING TIME until 1/22/2024 for Defendant Walgreen, Co. to answer or otherwise plead. Signed by deputy clerk on 1/22/2024. (nac) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED -- Certified Mail by Mandy Malla upon Walgreen, Co. served on 12/18/2023, answer due 1/8/2024 (Mach, Cooper) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Mandy Malla. (Mach, Cooper) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $405, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6222330.), filed by Mandy Malla. (Attachments: #1 Charge of Discrimination, #2 Notice of Right to Sue)(Mach, Cooper) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to WALGREEN, CO. Registered Agent: The Prentice-Hall Corporation System, Kansas, Inc. (issued to Attorney for service) Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge Form provided to counsel for service with complaint. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (nac) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Toby Crouse and Magistrate Judge Angel D. Mitchell for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (nac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Malla v. Walgreen, Co. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Mandy Malla | |
Represented By: | Cooper S. Mach |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: WALGREEN, CO. | |
Represented By: | Madeline Nebel |
Represented By: | Stacy Murrow Bunck |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.