Hazzard v. O'Malley
Plaintiff: Jeffrey M. Hazzard
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party: Social Security Administration - Office of General Counsel
Case Number: 2:2024cv02011
Filed: January 12, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Presiding Judge: Eric F Melgren
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2024 Filing 6 SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD - Certified copy of transcript of record by Defendant Social Security Administration, Commissioner of. Initial Brief due by 3/28/2024. (Verdis, Michelle)
January 12, 2024 Filing 5 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE by Michelle Verdis on behalf of Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (Verdis, Michelle)
January 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions Under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the clerk has notified the US Attorney and the SSA Office of General Counsel of this action electronically; no summonses will be issued Social Security Administrative Record due 3/12/2024. Signed by Chief District Judge Eric F. Melgren on 1/12/2024. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (cm)
January 12, 2024 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis NOTE - Access to document is restricted pursuant to the courts privacy policy. by Plaintiff Jeffrey M Hazzard (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Sciolaro, Kyle)
January 12, 2024 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Jeffrey M Hazzard. (Sciolaro, Kyle)
January 12, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT - SOCIAL SECURITY with trial location of Kansas City. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Fed. R. Civ. P. Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions, the Notice of Electronic Filing for this Complaint has been transmitted to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Kansas, as well as the Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel, filed by Jeffrey M Hazzard.(Sciolaro, Kyle)
January 12, 2024 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to Chief District Judge Eric F. Melgren for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (ca)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hazzard v. O'Malley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey M. Hazzard
Represented By: Andrea McGrath Wehner
Represented By: Roger M. Driskill
Represented By: Kyle Henry Sciolaro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Represented By: Michelle Verdis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration - Office of General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?