Aether DBS LLC v. BPC Cascade et al
| Aether DBS LLC |
| BPC Cascade, Overland Contracting, Inc. and PCL Industrial Management, Inc. |
| 2:2024cv02116 |
| March 27, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Daniel D Crabtree |
| Rachel E Schwartz |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Aether DBS LLC identifying none as corporate parent . (Johnston, J.) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Aether DBS LLC. (Johnston, J.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $405, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6308443.), filed by Aether DBS LLC. (Attachments: #1 Ex. A - Invoice 22C0812, #2 Ex. B - Invoice 22C0890, #3 Ex. C - Invoice 22C1251, #4 Ex. D - Demand Letter)(Johnston, J.) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree and Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (jk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
