Bentz v. Marion, Kansas, City of et al
| Cheri Bentz |
| Marion, Kansas, City of, David Mayfield, Gideon Cody, Zach Hudlin, Jeff Soyez and Aaron Christner |
| 2:2024cv02120 |
| March 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Teresa J James |
| Holly L Teeter |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Cheri Bentz - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Weslander, J.) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Cheri Bentz. (Weslander, J.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $405, Internet Payment Receipt Number BKSDC-6310863.), filed by Cheri Bentz. (Weslander, J.) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Holly L. Teeter and Magistrate Judge Teresa J. James for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (jsh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
