Legend Corporation, The v. Aspen Guard, LLC
| Legend Corporation, The doing business as Broadmore Kennels |
| Aspen Guard, LLC doing business as Folding Guard |
| 2:2024cv02129 |
| April 3, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Toby Crouse |
| Rachel E Schwartz |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support by Defendant Aspen Guard, LLC (Attachments: #1 Ex. A, #2 Ex. B, #3 Ex. C, #4 Ex. D, #5 Ex. E, #6 Ex. F)(Schuler, Anna) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Certificate of Notice of Filing Notice of Removal by Aspen Guard, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Schuler, Anna) |
| Filing 5 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Defendant Aspen Guard, LLC - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Schuler, Anna) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for attorney Stephen J Zralek to appear pro hac vice ( Pro hac vice fee $50, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6314512.) by Defendant Aspen Guard, LLC (referred to Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 ECF Registration Form) (Schuler, Anna) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Aspen Guard, LLC identifying none as corporate parent . (Schuler, Anna) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Defendant Aspen Guard, LLC. (Schuler, Anna) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court of Johnson County, Kansas, case number 24CV01250 Trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $405, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6314482.), filed by Aspen Guard, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Ex. A, #2 Ex. B, #3 Ex. C, #4 Ex. D) (Schuler, Anna) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Toby Crouse and Magistrate Judge Rachel E. Schwartz for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (jsh) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Designation of place of trial is missing. The filing party/attorney is directed to correct the deficiency immediately. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jsh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Legend Corporation, The v. Aspen Guard, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Legend Corporation, The doing business as Broadmore Kennels | |
| Represented By: | Ronald P. Wood |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Aspen Guard, LLC doing business as Folding Guard | |
| Represented By: | Anna Grace Schuler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
