Malone v. Ford County Sheriff's Office et al
| Amethyst Malone |
| Ford County Sheriff's Office, Jared Mindrup, Clark County Sheriff's Office and Heath Heston |
| 2:2024cv02170 |
| April 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Daniel D Crabtree |
| Brooks G Severson |
| P.I.: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Amethyst Malone. (Porto, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $405, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-6332909.), filed by Amethyst Malone. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Porto, Thomas) Modified on 4/26/2024 to restrict the attachment which was corrupted. See docket entry 2 for corrected Civil Cover Sheet. (jk) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree and Magistrate Judge Brooks G. Severson for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at http://www.uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/notice-consent-and-reference-civil-action-magistrate-judge (jk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
