Tao v. University of Kansas
Feng Tao and Franklin Tao |
University of Kansas |
2:2025cv02005 |
January 3, 2025 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Julie A Robinson |
Brooks G Severson |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 DESIGNATION OF PLACE OF TRIAL filed by Plaintiff Feng Tao - trial to be held in Kansas City. (Donnelly, Matthew) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Feng Tao. (Donnelly, Matthew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $405, Internet Payment Receipt Number BKSDC-6553703.), filed by Feng Tao. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A)(Donnelly, Matthew) |
NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Julie A. Robinson and Magistrate Judge Brooks G. Severson for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at https://www.uscourts.gov/file/459/download (jk) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Designation of place of trial is missing. The filing party/attorney is directed to correct the deficiency immediately. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.