Williams v. GPI KS-SK, Inc. et al
| Kaden Williams |
| GPI KS-SK, Inc. and Group 1 Automotive, Inc. |
| 2:2026cv02476 |
| August 11, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Eric F Melgren |
| Jennifer B Wieland |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiff Kaden Williams. (Russell, Drew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with trial location of Kansas City ( Filing fee $405, Internet Payment Receipt Number AKSDC-7066524.), filed by Kaden Williams.(Russell, Drew) |
| NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Case assigned to District Judge Eric F. Melgren and Magistrate Judge Jennifer B. Wieland for all proceedings. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY: A United States magistrate judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action if all parties voluntarily consent. Information & consent forms are available at https://www.uscourts.gov/file/459/download (jk) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to GPI KS-SK, Inc., Group 1 Automotive, Inc. (issued to Attorney for service). Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge Form provided to counsel for service with complaint. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry) (jk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
