Securities and Exchange Commission v. Tanner et al
Case Number: |
5:2005cv04057 |
Filed: |
May 4, 2005 |
Court: |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Office: |
Topeka Office |
Presiding Judge: |
Richard D. Rogers |
Presiding Judge: |
K. Gary Sebelius |
Nature of Suit: |
Securities/Commodities |
Cause of Action: |
15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
December 28, 2010 |
Filing
457
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The Receiver's Motion (Doc.#456)is granted. FURTHER ORDERED that Local Rule 7.1(d) is waived for the motion and this Order is effective immediately upon entry on the Court's CM/ECF system. FURTHER ORDERED that the Rece iver is authorized to pay Larry E. Cook the sum of $19,952.50 for fees and expenses incurred through December 22, 2010. The Receiver is further authorized to pay Lathrop & Gage LLP the sum of $9,421.61 for fees and expenses incurred through December 22, 2010. FURTHER ORDERED that the Receiver is authorized and directed to withhold the sum of $12,500 for the Receiver and $19,500 for Lathrop & Gage LLP to cover final estate termination administration and tax preparation & filin g. FURTHER ORDERED that the Receiver shall make the final distribution to allowed claim holders in this case as set forth in Exhbiit C to the Motion. FURTHER ORDERED that the Receiver's, and his attornes' and agents' actions to date in this case are approved and that upon the filing of a Certificate of Compliance byt he Receiver confirming to the Court that all final distribution checks have been delivered to the claim holders and the checks have cleared the Receiver's Distri bution Account, or, in the event on or more claim holders cannot be located, that the Receiver has paid such unclaimed funds to the US Treasury, the Receiver and his attorneys and agents are thereby discharged from this case and all liability and claims, unknown or unknown against the Receiver, his attorneys, and his staff are thereby discharged. Signed by District Judge Richard D. Rogers on 12/28/2010. (meh)
|
October 8, 2010 |
Filing
455
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 454 Motion for Order for approval of payment of fees and expenses. Receiver's Amended Twenty-Fourth Application for Approval of Payment of Professional Fees and Expenses (Doc. # 454) be and hereby is granted. The Receiver is authorized to pay Larry E. Cook the sum of $9,430 for fees and expenses incurred through August 31, 2010. The Receiver is further authorized to pay Lathrop & Gage LLP the sum of $10,823.95 for fees and expenses incurred through August 31, 2010. Signed by District Judge Richard D. Rogers on 10/8/10. (meh) Modified on 10/12/2010 (WO)(lak).
|
December 29, 2008 |
Filing
424
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 423 Receiver's Seventeenth Application for Approval of Payment of Professional Fees and Expenses. The Receiver is authorized to pay Larry E. Cook the sum of $15,063.75 for fees and expenses incurred through November 30, 2008. The Receiver is further authorized to pay Lathrop & Gage L.C. the sum of $3,616.35 for fees and expenses incurred through November 30, 2008. Signed by District Judge Richard D. Rogers on 12/29/08. (ms)
|
May 17, 2005 |
Filing
29
ORDER OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, ORDER FREEZING ASSETS AND GRANTING OTHER RELIEF as to David Tanner, Individually and d/b/a Capital Enhancement Club, Rocky D. Spencer, Marroc Corp., Richard Kringen, Margaret F. Spencer, Omnibus LLC, and Vectra Resources, LLC. See attached for more details. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 5/17/05. (bmw)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?