Elrod v. Walker et al
5:2006cv03115 |
April 17, 2006 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Topeka Office |
Sam A. Crow |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 67 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The defendant's motion 25 to dismiss or for summary judgment is granted. See attached for more details. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 12/20/2011. Mailed to pro se party: Mr. Anthony Wayne Elrod, Reg. No. 24994-077, Coleman II - USP, PO Box 1034, Coleman, FL 33521 by regular mail. (bmw) |
Filing 58 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion 2 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Plaintiff is granted twenty (20) days to show cause why the complaint should not be summarily dismissed. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 9/8/2011. (Mailed to pro se party Anthony Wayne Elrod by regular mail.) (smnd) |
Filing 40 ORDER ENTERED: Defendants' motion 27 to file Exhibit A3, Attachments 6 through 8, to Niles' Declaration ex parte is granted. Defendants' motion 27 to file Exhibit A2, Attachment 5, to Niles' Declaration conventionally and und er seal is granted. Defendants are to arrange and provide for plaintiff's timely viewing of the sealed exhibit. Plaintiff is granted sixty (60) days from the date of this order to file a response to defendants' motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff's motions 34 & 39 for stay are denied. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 3/24/2011. (Mailed to pro se party Anthony Wayne Elrod by regular mail.) (smnd) |
Filing 12 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff proceeds in forma pauperis. All Bivens claims against the United States, the Bureau of Prisons, and any individual defendant in their official capacity are dismissed as stating no claim for relief. Plaintiff's attempt to seek relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241, and plaintiff's related request for injunctive relief, are dismissed. Claim Five in the amended complaint is dismissed without prejudice and defendants Bledsoe, Brown, Pigos, Peroria, Fasciana and Norwood ar e dismissed as parties in this matter. Claims two, Three and Four in the amended complaint are dismissed as stating no claim for relief and defendants McCollum, Stratton, Sedillo, Gallegos and Lappin are dismissed as parties in this matter. A respo nse to plaintiff's allegations of excessive force in Claim One in the amended complaint is required from defendants Walker, Lacy, Gum and Gray, and that a response to plaintiff's allegation of retaliation in Claim One in the amended complai nt is required from defendant Gray. A response by the United States to plaintiff's claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act is required. The clerk's office is to prepare waiver and summons forms pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 for each remaining defendant. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 03/31/10. (smnd) |
Filing 7 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion 2 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is provisionally granted subject to plaintiff's payment within thirty (30) days of an intitial partial filing fee of $36.50. Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days to amend and supplement the complaint to cure deficiencies identified by the court for proceeding under 28 U.S.C. 2241 and the Federal Tort Claims Act, and for avoiding summary dismissal of the claims and defendants identified by the court. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 08/20/09. (smnd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Elrod v. Walker et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.