White v. Werholtz et al
| Bobby Bruce White |
| Roger Werholtz, (fnu) Knight, L E Bruce, J K Jones, (fnu) Holthaus, Cynthia Hendry, David R. McKune, Carolyn Perez and Karen Rohling |
| 5:2007cv03182 |
| July 12, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Pawnee |
| Sam A. Crow |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
120
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 106 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant Perez is dismissed from the case. Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment due process claims and Eighth Amendment claim remain for trial. IT IS FU RTHER ORDERED that appointment of counsel is now appropriate for trial. The court will appoint counsel for plaintiff to handle the trial of the remaining claims. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 12/2/2010. Mailed to pro se party Bobby Bruce White, Bobby Bruce White, #76983, LARNED State Hospital, Isaac Ray Building, 1301 KS Highway 264, Larned, KS 67550 by regular mail. (jw)
|
|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying without prejudice Defendants' 35 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 5/4/2009. (jw)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER denying without prejudice 38 Motion for Additional Information Needed for "Martinez Report." Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 3/23/2009. (jw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
