Rhodes v. Raymond et al
Ronald L Rhodes |
Don Raymond, Roger Werholtz, David R. McKune, Donald Portice, Shirley Hensley and Rudy Feliciano |
5:2007cv03228 |
August 30, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Topeka Office |
Leavenworth |
Sam A. Crow |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 65 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying as moot 52 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 54 Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants' motions for summary judgment are denied as moot. See memorandum and order for further details. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 6/12/2009. (jw) |
Filing 62 ORDER re 52 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Don Raymond, 54 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Roger Werholtz, Shirley Hensley, Donald Portice, David R. McKune, Rudy Feliciano. IT IS ORDERED that the court will reserve a ruling on the pen ding summary judgment motions. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that both parties will have twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order within which to file a brief as directed in this order. Briefs are not to exceed ten (10) pages. Each party will have eleven (11) days from the date of the opposing party's brief is filed in which to file a response, not to exceed five (5) pages. See order for further details. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 4/23/2009. (jw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.