Ellibee v. Feleciano et al
Plaintiff: Nathaniel W. Ellibee
Defendant: Paul Feleciano, Jr, Robert Sanders and Patricia A Biggs
Case Number: 5:2008cv03186
Filed: July 29, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office
County: Butler
Presiding Judge: Sam A. Crow
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 47 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion 24 for joinder is granted in that Michael Thomas Sawyer is substituted for Paul Feleciano to the extent plaintiff seeks relief in that defendant's official capacity. Plaintiff's motio n 42 for relief from judgment and motion 38 for certification of a question to the Kansas Supreme Court are denied. Plaintiff's motion 35 to honor his designation of trial venue is denied as moot. Defendants' motion 34 to dismiss plaintiff's civil rights claims in the amanded hybrid complaint and habeas petition is granted. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241 in this hybrid action is denied. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 3/22/2011. (Mailed to pro se party Nathaniel W. Ellibee by regular mail) (smnd)
October 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion 14 for a certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 10/20/09. (smnd)
September 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion 7 for reconsideration of the court's dismissal without prejudice of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. 2241 is denied. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed as stating no claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and without prejudice to plaintiff's pursuit of any state law claim. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 09/11/09. (smnd)
February 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion 2 for leave to amend the complaint is granted. Plaintiff is granted twenty (20) days to show cause why this action filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241 and 42 U.S.C. 1983 should not be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 02/26/09. (smnd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ellibee v. Feleciano et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathaniel W. Ellibee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul Feleciano, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Sanders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patricia A Biggs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?