Brown, et al. vs. Peter Francis Jude Beagle Law Office, et al.
| Rufus E Brown, James R Brown and Berniece Williams |
| Peter Francis Jude Beagle Law Office, George C Smith, John Holland Jones and Laura Jansen |
| 5:2008cv03311 |
| December 30, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office |
| Johnson |
| Sam A. Crow |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's request to transfer this case to the District Court in the District of Columbia is denied. The complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 04/29/09. (smnd)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER ENTERED: The motion 2 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Berneice Williams is granted. The motion 4 for appointment of counsel filed by Berneice Williams is denied without prejudice. James Brown and Rufus Brown are dismissed without prejudice as parties in this case and Berneice Williams remains the sole plaintiff. Plaintiff Berneice Williams is granted fifteen (15) days to show cause why the complaint should not be dismissed without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction over any named defendant and for improper venue. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 03/03/09. (smnd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
