Garza v. Correct Care Solutions
Jose Garza |
Correct Care Solutions |
5:2009cv03146 |
July 7, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Topeka Office |
Pawnee |
Sam A. Crow |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 ORDER ENTERED: The motion 16 of defendants CCS for summary judgment is sustained and the claims against all defendants are dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff's pending motions 23 , 26 & 28 are denied. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 6/28/2011. (Mailed to pro se party Jose Garza by regular mail.) (smnd) |
Filing 21 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's request 18 for service of a copy of the Martinez Report is granted. Interested Party KDOC is hereby ordered to immediately provide plaintiff with a complete copy of the Martinez Report and attachments filed herein a nd to provide certification of service to the court. The motion 16 of defendant CCS to dismiss and alternative motion for summary judgment is hereby treated as defendant's motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff's request 18 for an ext ension of time to rebut the Martinez Report and defendant's motion to dismiss are sustained to the extent that plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days in which to file a proper response to defendant's motion 16 for summary judgment. Plaintiff's motion 19 for leave to amend complaint and all his other requests in his motion 18 for orders are denied without prejudice. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 11/01/10. (smnd) |
Filing 9 ORDER ENTERED: The clerk of the court shall prepare waiver of service forms pursuant to Rule 4(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The clerk of the court shall enter the Kansas Department of Corrections as an interested party on the docket f or the limited purpose of preparing the Martinez report. Correct Care Solutions at Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility and "John Doe Guard employed at LCF in 2003" are to be added as defendants in this case. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 03/02/10. (smnd) |
Filing 3 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's application 2 to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, and he is assessed the full filing fee of $350.00 for this complaint, to be paid through payments automatically deducted from his inmate account after he ha s satisfied his prior fee obligations. Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days in which to file an "Amended Complaint" naming proper defendants and setting forth sufficient facts which show the personal participation of each person named as a defendant in the alleged denial of medical treatment. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 09/09/09. (smnd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Garza v. Correct Care Solutions | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jose Garza | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Correct Care Solutions | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.