Montgomery v. Chester et al
| Le Pize Q.E. Montgomery |
| C. Chester, M. Puckett, M. Cunneen, R. Walker, J. Mathews and M. Skinner |
| 5:2009cv03244 |
| November 10, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Leavenworth |
| Richard D. Rogers |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER ENTERED: Petitioner's motions 11 & 12 for sanctions are denied. This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Signed by Senior District Judge Richard D. Rogers on 02/17/10. (smnd)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER ENTERED: Petitioner's motion 2 to proceed without prepayment of fees is granted. Petitioner's request 1 for appointment of counsel in the petition and his motion 3 to appoint counsel are denied without prejudice. Petitioner� 39;s motion 4 to amend preliminary injunction and immediate release is denied. Petitioner is granted thirty (30) days in which to either allege additional sufficient facts showing a denial of due process and full and proper exhaustion, or show cau se why this action should not be dismissed for failure to state sufficient facts and for failure to show full and proper exhaustion of all available adminstrative remedies. Signed by Senior District Judge Richard D. Rogers on 12/23/09. (smnd) Modified on 12/29/2009 (ms).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
