Markovich v. Correct Care Solutions et al
Plaintiff: Matthew Paul Markovich
Defendant: Correct Care Solutions and Tonya Taylor
Case Number: 5:2010cv03097
Filed: May 4, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Topeka Office
County: Pawnee
Presiding Judge: Sam A. Crow
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion to reopen this action is treated as a motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 60(b) and is denied. Plaintiff's request 25 for order for records and motion 26 for alteration of previous order are denied. Plaintiff's motion 27 to withdraw motion to amend is granted and his motion 24 to amend is denied as a result. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 9/20/2011. (Mailed to pro se party Matthew Paul Markovich by regular mail.) (smnd)
November 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion 18 to vacate order assessing fee and demand for refund is denied. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 11/30/10. (Mailed to pro se party Matthew Paul Markovich by regular mail.) (smnd)
July 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion 2 for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees is granted, his objections to the asessement of fees herein are denied, and he is assessed the full filing fee for this action of $350.00 to be collected through payments automatically deducted from his inmate account. This action is dismissed, without prejudice, on account of plaintiff's failure to show proper and full exhaustion of administrative remedies. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 07/08/10. (smnd)
May 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted twenty (20) days in which to submit to the court an initial partial filing fee of $25.50. Any objection to this order must be filed on or before the date payment is due. The failure to pay the fees as requir ed by federal law may result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. Within the same twenty (20) day period, plaintiff must show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to show full and proper exhaustion of administrative remedies on the claims raised in the complaint and for failure to allege sufficient facts to support a claim of federal constitutional violation. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 05/13/10. (smnd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Markovich v. Correct Care Solutions et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matthew Paul Markovich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Correct Care Solutions
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tonya Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?