Azim Razzaq v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
| Karim M. Azim Razzaq |
| Corrections Corporation of America, D. Volle, B. Limeweaver, E. Garcia and (fnu) Castellion |
| 5:2010cv03123 |
| June 7, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Sam A. Crow |
| Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying as moot 19 plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel ; granting 26 defendants' Motion to Dismiss; granting 26 defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; and denying as moot 28 plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 3/20/2012. Mailed to pro se party Karim M. Azim Razzaq by regular mail. (mss)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff shall supply the court on or before January 7, 2011, with a certified copy of his institutional financial records for the six months preceding June 2010 from all facilities in which he was housed during that pe riod. The failure to file a timely response may result in the dismissal of this action without further notice to plaintiff. Plaintiff's motion 3 for the appointment of counsel is denied with leave to renew the motion. Plaintiff's motion 4 for leave to amend the complaint is granted. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 12/07/10. (Mailed to pro se party Karim M. Azim Razzaq by regular mail.) (smnd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
