Booth et al v. Davis
| Scott Booth, Katie Michelle Booth, Colten Scott Booth and Brian Cory Booth |
| Grant Davis |
| 5:2010cv04010 |
| February 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Johnson |
| Sam A. Crow |
| K. Gary Sebelius |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
249
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part 210 Motion for determination of method for proof of damage causation (SEALED)is granted to the extent that the court finds that the trial-within-a-trial method of proof is not a legal prerequisite under Missour i law for establishing claims of lost settlement value. This ruling is not a finding that plaintiffs' proof of damages and causation will be sufficient to prevail upon a summary judgment motion or at trial. Signed by District Judge Richard D. Rogers on 10/28/14. (meh)
|
|
Filing
208
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 183 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Gary Sebelius on 7/17/14. (bh)
|
|
Filing
85
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 27 Defendant's Motion to Quash; denying 22 Forest Hanna's Motion to Quash. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Gary Sebelius on 5/23/2011. A copy of this order was sent to Forest Hanna by regular U.S. mail. (bh)
|
|
Filing
82
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 51 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Gary Sebelius on 4/28/2011. (bh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
