Dodson Aviation, Inc. vs. Orlando Padron, et al
| Dodson Aviation, Inc. |
| Orlando Padron, Javier Jorda, HLMP Aviation Corporation, Green, Finch & Covington, Chartered, Blaine Finch, Craig A. Davis and Franklin County Board of Commissioners |
| 5:2010cv04036 |
| April 16, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Franklin |
| J. Thomas Marten |
| James P. O'Hara |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 69 Motion for Relief. See order for details. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 8/24/2012. (aa)
|
|
Filing
68
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 62 Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 12/21/2011. (mss)
|
|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 33 defendants HLMP Aviation Corporation, Javier Jorda and Orlando Padron's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 40 defendants Blaine Finch and Green, Finch & Covington,Chartered's Motion for Summary Judgment; and granting 17 defendants Craig A. Davis and the Franklin County Board of Commissioner's Motion for Judgment on the pleadings. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 3/21/2011. (mss)
|
|
Filing
59
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying plaintiff's objection to Magistrate Judge's Order (Dkt. No. 51). Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 12/8/10. (mss)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
