Debord v. Mercy Health System of Kansas, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Sara C. Debord
Defendant: Mercy Health System of Kansas, Inc. and Leonard Weaver
Case Number: 5:2010cv04055
Filed: May 27, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Topeka Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: Wesley E. Brown
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 197 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 194 Motion for review. Defendant's motion for review 195 is denied. Clerk of Court is directed to re-tax costs according to this order. Signed by District Judge Sam A. Crow on 4/29/14. (mb)
April 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 178 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Defendant Mercy Health System of Kansass motion under Rule 59(e) to amend the judgment so that it may file a bill of costs (Dk. 175) is denied. See attached for more details. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 4/17/2012. (bmw)
March 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 168 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Defendant Mercy Health System of Kansas (Mercy) motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs sexual harassment and retaliation claims (Dk. 146) is granted; Defendant Leonard Weavers motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs assaul t and battery claim (Dk. 146) is granted; and Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on Weavers counterclaim for defamation (Dk. 144) is granted. See attached for more details. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 3/20/2012. (bmw)
February 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 167 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Defendant Weavers motion for leave to file an amended pretrial order (Dk. 148) is denied. See attached for more details. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 2/22/2012. (bmw)
August 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 137 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 111 Defendants' Motion to Compel; granting 113 Defendants' Motion to Continue Pretrial Conference; denying 119 Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time; granting 120 Defendant Weaver's Motion to amend. Defendant Weaver shall file his amended counterclaim on or before 8/15/2011. See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen M. Humphreys on 8/8/2011. (sj)
March 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 87 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER finding as moot 52 Defendants' Motion to Compel. See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen M. Humphreys on 3/15/2011. (sj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Debord v. Mercy Health System of Kansas, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sara C. Debord
Represented By: Mark A. Buchanan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mercy Health System of Kansas, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Leonard Weaver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?