Samuel R. Jahnke and Sons et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.
Samuel R. Jahnke and Sons and Samuel R. Jahnke |
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc. |
5:2010cv04098 |
August 23, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Topeka Office |
Geary |
Karen M. Humphreys |
J. Thomas Marten |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 69 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting plaintiffs' request for remand. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 8/6/2012. (mss) |
Filing 47 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 45 defendant's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 12/13/2011. (mss) |
Filing 43 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying Defendant's 37 Motion to Strike ; granting 37 Motion for Leave to File Exhibit 1 to its motion; granting 40 Motion for Leave; granting in part and denying in part 16 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 9/28/2011. (jlw) |
Filing 33 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 18 Defendant's Motion for Protective Order - Defendant shall answer the written discovery requests on or before 5/3/2011; denying 30 Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order and to Quash Subpoena - Counsel shall confer and the tax record production/deposition shall be completed on or before May 18, 2011. See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen M. Humphreys on 4/18/2011. (sj) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.