Colson v. Shepler et al
| Bradley Wayne Colson |
| (fnu) Keeney, (fnu) Parker, Kris Jones, Charles Moose and Donita Trukken |
| 5:2010cv04153 |
| December 22, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Saline |
| Richard D. Rogers |
| K. Gary Sebelius |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 82 Motion to Dismiss by defendants Trukken and Moose. The claims against defendants Kris Jones and Dr. Keeny are dismissed for lack of prosecution. Signed by District Judge Richard D. Rogers on 12/27/2011. Mailed to pro se party Bradley Wayne Colson by certified mail; Certified Tracking Number: 7008 2810 0001 3678 4519. (ms)
|
|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 59 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim as to defendant Parker. The court shall decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's state law claims. Signed by District Judge Richard D. Rogers on 9/19/2011.Mailed to pro se party Bradley Wayne Colson by regular mail (meh)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 15 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by District Judge Richard D. Rogers on 3/8/2011.Mailed to pro se party Bradley W. Colson by certified mail; Certified Tracking Number: 70101060000094210748 (meh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
