Barber v. Kansas, State of et al

Barber v. Kansas, State of et al

Petitioner:	Terry L. Barber
Respondent:	Kansas, State of and Steve Six
Case Number:	5:2011cv03014
Filed:	January 18, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office:	Topeka Office
County:	Butler
Presiding Judge:	Sam A. Crow
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 27, 2013	Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The petitions under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus (Dks. 1 and 9) are denied and no certificate of appealability shall be granted. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 2/27/2013. Mailed to pro se party: Mr. Terry. L. Barber, Reg. No. 84515, El Dorado Correctional Facility, PO Box 311, El Dorado, KS 67042 by regular mail. (bmw)
January 10, 2012	Filing 6 ORDER ENTERED: Respondents' motion 5 to dismiss the petition without prejudice is denied. Petitioner is granted thirty (30) days from the date of this order to file an amended petition if he chooses to raise additional claims. Respondents ar e granted additional time to file an answer and return, either sixty (60) days from the date of this order, or thirty (30) days from the date of petitioner's amendment of the petition, whichever date is later. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 1/10/2012. (Mailed to pro se party Terry L. Barber by regular mail.) (smnd)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 27, 2013

Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The petitions under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus (Dks. 1 and 9) are denied and no certificate of appealability shall be granted. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 2/27/2013. Mailed to pro se party: Mr. Terry. L. Barber, Reg. No. 84515, El Dorado Correctional Facility, PO Box 311, El Dorado, KS 67042 by regular mail. (bmw)

January 10, 2012

Filing 6 ORDER ENTERED: Respondents' motion 5 to dismiss the petition without prejudice is denied. Petitioner is granted thirty (30) days from the date of this order to file an amended petition if he chooses to raise additional claims. Respondents ar e granted additional time to file an answer and return, either sixty (60) days from the date of this order, or thirty (30) days from the date of petitioner's amendment of the petition, whichever date is later. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 1/10/2012. (Mailed to pro se party Terry L. Barber by regular mail.) (smnd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barber v. Kansas, State of et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Terry L. Barber
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Kansas, State of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Steve Six
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?