Mitchell v. Groh et al
| Marcus D. Mitchell, Sr. |
| John Groh and Wichita, City of |
| 5:2011cv03063 |
| March 16, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Sedgwick |
| Sam A. Crow |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion 2 to proceed without prepayments of fees is granted. This action is dismissed, without prejudice, on account of plaintiff's failure to comply with the court's Memorandum and Order entered on April 15, 2011. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 8/2/2011. (Mailed to pro se party Marcus D. Mitchell, Sr. by regular mail.) (smnd)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is given twenty (20) days in which to submit a certified copy of his institutional account for the six months immediately preceding the filing of this complaint as required by statute to support his motion to p roceed without prepayment of fees. Within the same twenty-day period, plaintiff is required to advise the court of the status of any state parole revocation or criminal proceedings pending against him and to show cause why this action should not be dismissed. Plaintiff's motion 3 to appoint counsel is denied without prejudice. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 4/15/2011. (Mailed to pro se party Marcus D. Mitchell by regular mail.) (smnd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
