Loggins v. Sedgwick County Sheriff's Department et al
Kevin D. Loggins |
Sedgwick County Sheriff's Department, Robert Hinshaw and Larry Bragg |
5:2011cv03079 |
April 12, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Topeka Office |
Reno |
Sam A. Crow |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion 2 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. This action is dismissed and all relief is denied without prejudice. This action counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 7/20/2011. (Mailed to pro se party Kevin D. Loggins by regular mail.) (smnd) Modified to add text on 7/20/2011 (smnd). |
Filing 4 ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted twenty (20) days in which to submit to the court an initial partial filing fee of $27.00. Any objection to this order must be filed on or before the date payment is due. The failure to pay the fees as requir ed herein may result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. Within the same twenty-day period, plaintiff must show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim for relief in federal court and counted as a strike . Plaintiff's motion 3 to amend is denied and the contents of this pleading was instead considered by the court as a supplement. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 6/14/2011. (Mailed to pro se party Kevin D. Loggins by regular mail.) (smnd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.