Serrano v. Ackley et al
| Jose Eduardo Serrano |
| Steven M. Schneider, Robert F. Ackley, Elizabeth E. Mascorro, James E. Bedard and J. W. Martin, Jr. |
| 5:2011cv03091 |
| May 6, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Reno |
| Sam A. Crow |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Defendants' motion 43 to dismiss, which the court has now converted to a motion for summary judgment, is granted. Judgment shall be granted to the defendants and against the plaintiff on all remaining claims as set forth in the foregoing memorandum. Signed by Senior District Judge Richard D. Rogers on 9/24/2013. (Mailed to pro se party Jose Eduardo Serrano by regular mail.) (smnd)
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Defendants' motion 43 to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. The court shall dismiss defendants Mascorro and Schneider from this action. The remainder of the motion shall be converted to a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff shall have until September 13, 2013, to file a response to the motion. The remaining defendants may then file a reply within the time limits of D.Kan. Rule 6.1(d)(2). Signed by Senior District Judge Richard D. Rogers on 8/16/2013. (Mailed to pro se party Jose Eduardo Serrano by regular mail.) (smnd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
