Miller v. California, State of et al
| Michael Anthony Miller |
| California, State of and Attorney General of Kansas |
| 5:2011cv03094 |
| May 9, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Sam A. Crow |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER ENTERED: Petitioner's motion 2 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted for the purpose of dismissing this action only. This action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and improper venue, and all relief is denied for reasons stated in the court's Order dated June 14, 2011, and herein. Any application for a certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 7/13/2011. (Mailed to pro se party Michael Anthony Miller by regular mail.) (smnd)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER ENTERED: Petitioner is granted 15 days to provide the financial information to support his motion to proceed in forma pauperis and to show cause why this action should not be dismissed, without prejudice, for improper venue and lack of jurisdic tion. Petitioner's motion 3 to order Office of Vital Statistics to produce is denied and any application for a certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 6/14/2011. (Mailed to pro se party Michael Anthony Miller by regular mail.) (smnd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
