Acosta-Felton v. Grinkey et al
||(fnu) Grinkey, (fnu) Defon, (fnu) Kennedy, (fnu) Miller, (fnu) Bailey and (fnu) Myles
||May 24, 2011
||US District Court for the District of Kansas
||Kathryn H. Vratil
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1441
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 19, 2013
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Defendants' motion 56 to dismiss is granted. Plaintiff's claims against defendants Schoen and Klingele are dismissed as time-barred. The court shall also dismiss plaintiff's 1986 claim against all defendants as time-barred. Signed by Senior District Judge Richard D. Rogers on 2/19/2013. (smnd)
|June 21, 2011
ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion 5 for remand is denied. This matter is returned to the clerk of the court for random reassignment pursuant to D. Kan. Rule. 40.1. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 6/21/2011. (Mailed to pro se party Rey Acosta-Felton by regular mail.) (smnd)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?