Smalls v. Richardson et al
Plaintiff: Anthony Maurice Smalls
Defendant: Shelton Richardson and J. Michael Stouffer
Case Number: 5:2011cv03150
Filed: August 19, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Topeka Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Sam A. Crow
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 61 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion 57 for reconsideration and motion 59 to properly ask for motion for reconsideration are denied. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 5/29/2013. (Mailed to pro se party Anthony Maurice Smalls by regular mail.) (smnd)
September 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 55 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: The motion of defendant Richardson to dismiss for failure to state a claim or for lack of jurisdiction is granted. The motion of defendant J. Michael Stauffer to dismiss or, alternatively, for summary judgment is grant ed. Plaintiff's motion 17 to amend, motion 18 to submit a supplemental complaint, motion 23 for preliminary injunction, motion 29 for leave to amend complaint, motion 30 for ruling and for a hearing, motion 31 to amend complaint, mo tion 32 for hearing, motion 37 to appoint counsel, motion 38 to amend complaint, motion 45 for entry of evidence, motion 47 to deny any and all motions to dismiss, motion 49 for order and for reconsideration, motion 50 to amend or corre ct motion for leave to amend complaint, motion 51 to amend, for leave to amend and for reconsideration, motion 53 for order, and motion 54 and declaration for entry of evidence are denied as moot. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 9/25/2012. (Mailed to pro se party Anthony Maurice Smalls by regular mail.) (smnd)
November 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motions 3 , 9 & 10 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are denied. The clerk of the court shall issue appropriate waivers pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure with costs as sessed to the plaintiff. Plaintiff's motion 5 for the appointment of counsel is denied. Plaintiff's motion 6 to deny any motion to dismiss and to award him summary judgment is denied. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 11/1/2011. (Mailed to pro se party Anthony Maurice Smalls by regular mail.) (smnd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smalls v. Richardson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Maurice Smalls
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shelton Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Michael Stouffer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?