Witherspoon v. Florez et al
Darshawn Witherspoon |
James Florez, Michael Mooreman and Wyandotte County Criminal Justice System |
5:2011cv03166 |
September 20, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Topeka Office |
Wyandotte |
Sam A. Crow |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion 2 to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The matter is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by District Judge Sam A. Crow on 6/29/2012. (Mailed to pro se party Darshawn Witherspoon by regular mail.) (bt) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted to and including December 29, 2011, to supplement the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with a certified copy of his institutional financial records for the six months preceding September 2011 from all facilities in which he was housed during that period. Plaintiff is granted to and including December 29, 2011, to amend the complaint as directed herein. The failure to file a timely response may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted without additional prior notice to the plaintiff. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 11/29/2011. (Mailed to pro se party Darshawn Witherspoon by regular mail.) (smnd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.