Tatum v. Hewlett-Packard Co
Plaintiff: Marty Tatum
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Co
Case Number: 5:2011cv04078
Filed: July 18, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Topeka Office
County: Cloud
Presiding Judge: Karen M. Humphreys
Presiding Judge: Eric F. Melgren
Nature of Suit: Tort Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 49 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part 44 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Claims. See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen M. Humphreys on 4/20/2012. (sj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tatum v. Hewlett-Packard Co
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marty Tatum
Represented By: Todd B. Butler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hewlett-Packard Co
Represented By: Scott R. Ast
Represented By: Shannon D. Cohorst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?