Meredith v. Roberts et al
| Robert Meredith |
| Ray Roberts, Emiley Conover, Robbie Reynolds and (fnu) Arnett |
| 5:2012cv03027 |
| January 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Cowley |
| Sam A. Crow |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER ENTERED: This action is dismissed and all relief is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion 2 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied for failure to pay the assessed partial fee. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 7/6/2012. (Mailed to pro se party Robert Meredith by regular mail.) (smnd)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days in which to submit to the court an initial partial filing fee of $3.00. Any objection to this order must be filed on or before the date payment is due. Within the same thirty -day period, plaintiff is required to file a complete Amended Complaint upon court-provided forms that cures the deficiencies discussed herein. Plaintiff's motion 3 for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion 5 for leave to amend is granted to the extent discussed herein. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 4/20/2012. (Mailed to pro se party Robert Meredith by regular mail.) (smnd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
