Ross v. Heimgartner et al
Harvey L. Ross |
James Heimgartner and Derek Schmidt |
5:2012cv03085 |
April 5, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Topeka Office |
Butler |
Sam A. Crow |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 18 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 20 Motion for Leave to File Notice of Appeal; denying 21 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis; granting 25 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 10/22/14. Mailed to pro se party Harvey L. Ross by regular mail. (msb) |
Filing 16 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. This action is dismissed as time-barred, that Respondents' motion to dismiss (Dk. 12) is granted, and that all relief sought by petition of habeas corpus (Dk. 1) is denied. Petitioner's motion to supplement his response (Dk. 15) is granted. No certificate of appealability is granted. See attached for more details. Signed by U.S. District Senior Judge Sam A. Crow on 3/19/2013. (bmw) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Petitioner's motion 3 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is directed to submit the $5.00 filing fee to the clerk of the court on or before May 11, 2012. The motion 4 for an extension of time is granted. The time for filing a memorandum in support is extended to and including July 6, 2012. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 4/11/2012. (smnd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.