Perry v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
| Jason L. Perry |
| Federal Bureau of Prisons, J. Loftness, D. Treadway, J. Grissom and (fnu) Reyes |
| 5:2012cv03086 |
| April 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Leavenworth |
| Sam A. Crow |
| Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: This matter is dismissed without prejudice due to the lack of prosecution. Plaintiff's motion 2 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 7/17/2012. (Mailed to pro se party Jason L. Perry by regular mail.) (smnd)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted to and including July 6, 2012, to (1) submit a financial statement in support of the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) supplement the record with a statement of his pursuit of admin istrative remedies following the rejection of his earlier attempts; and (3) submit an amended complaint explaining how each individual defendant personally participated in the alleged violations of his protected rights. The failure to file a timely response may result in the dismissal of this matter without prejudice and without additional prior notice. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 6/5/2012. (Mailed to pro se party Jason L. Perry by regular mail.) (smnd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
