Mack v. United States of America et al
| Cedric Mack |
| FNU LNU (2), FNU LNU (1), United States of America and Corrections Corporation of America |
| 5:2012cv03090 |
| April 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Leavenworth |
| Sam A. Crow |
| Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion 7 for reconsideration is treated as a motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) and denied. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 11/8/2012. (Mailed to pro se party Cedric Mack by regular mail.) (smnd)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER ENTERED: This action is dismissed and all relief is denied, without prejudice, for failure to state facts to support a claim. Plaintiff's application 4 to proceed without prepayment of fees is granted and he is assessed the filing fee of $350.00. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 8/22/2012. (Mailed to pro se party Cedric Mack by regular mail.) (smnd)
|
|
Filing
2
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days in which to satisfy the filing fee prerequisites. Within the same thirty-day period, plaintiff must submit his complaint upon court-provided forms and cure the deficiences in his form complaint. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 6/6/2012. (Mailed to pro se party Cedric Mack by regular mail.) (smnd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
