Parrish (ID 25121) v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
| Daniel Joseph Parrish |
| Kansas Department of Corrections and Computer Repair Server |
| 5:2012cv03214 |
| October 4, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Pawnee |
| Sam A. Crow |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is liberally construed as a renewed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and is denied. Certification of the interlocutory appeal and leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis are denied. No stay will issue in this matter during the pendency of the appeal. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 10/17/2012. (Mailed to pro se party Daniel Joseph Parrish by regular mail.) (smnd)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff is granted to and including November 9, 2012, to submit the $350.00 filing fee. The failure to pay the full filing fee by that time will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion 2 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 10/10/2012. (Mailed to pro se party Daniel Joseph Parrish by regular mail.) (smnd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
