Price v. Attorney General of Kansas

Petitioner: Jerrell Price
Respondent: Attorney General of Kansas
Case Number: 5:2012cv03243
Filed: December 3, 2012
Court: Kansas District Court
Office: Topeka Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Sam A. Crow
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 18, 2013 3 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: The petition for habeas corpus is dismissed and all relief is denied. Petitioner's motion 2 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 3/18/2013.(Mailed to pro se party Jerrell Price by regular mail.) (Attachments: #(1) Unpublished Order) (smnd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Price v. Attorney General of Kansas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jerrell Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of Kansas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.