Baer v. Persels & Associates, LLC

Plaintiff: Robert L. Baer
Defendant: Persels & Associates, LLC
Case Number: 5:2013cv04024
Filed: February 7, 2013
Court: Kansas District Court
Office: Topeka Office
County: Shawnee
Presiding Judge: J. Thomas Marten
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Withdrawl
Cause of Action: 28:0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 18, 2015 23 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying, without prejudice, in part 20 plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge J. Thomas Marten on 6/18/15. Mailed to pro se party Persels & Associates by regular mail. (mss)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Baer v. Persels & Associates, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert L. Baer
Represented By: Robert L. Baer
Represented By: John T. Houston
Represented By: Martin J. Peck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Persels & Associates, LLC
Represented By: W. Thomas Gilman
Represented By: Christopher Michael Joseph
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?