Maestas (ID 89892) v. Waddington et al
| Michael Joseph Maestas, Jr. |
| Doug Waddington and Derek L. Schmidt |
| 5:2014cv03060 |
| April 15, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Pawnee |
| Sam A. Crow |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER ENTERED: Petitioner's motion 5 for reconsideration, if any, is denied. This court declines to certify petitioner's interlocutory appeal 6 , if any, and certifies that this appeal is not taken in good faith. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 05/14/14. (Mailed to pro se party Michael Joseph Maestas, Jr. by regular mail.) (smnd)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER ENTERED: Petitioner is granted thirty (30) days in which to submit a certified statement of his inmate account in support of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Within the same thirt-day period, petitioner is required to submit an Amende d Petition in which he states claims and grounds for federal habeas corpus relief and shows full and proper exhaustion of state remedies on each claim. Petitioner's imbedded requests 1 for unpublished orders, appointment of federal appellate counsel, and for subpoena of state appellate brief are denied. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 04/29/14. (Mailed to pro se party Michael Joseph Maestas, Jr. by regular mail.) (smnd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
