Mayes (ID 0106357) v. Kansas, State of
Petitioner: Damian Kevin Mayes
Respondent: Kansas, State of
Case Number: 5:2014cv03175
Filed: September 10, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Topeka Office
County: Norton
Presiding Judge: Sam A. Crow
Presiding Judge: David J. Waxse
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Petitioner's Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is denied. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 02/23/17. Mailed to pro se party Damian K. Mayes by regular mail. (smnd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mayes (ID 0106357) v. Kansas, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Damian Kevin Mayes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kansas, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?