Tunnell v. Gill et al
| Kelly S. Tunnell |
| Jason B. Gill, Jon Gill, Robert L. Hephner, Justin R. Manning and Daniel R. Mlagan |
| 5:2014cv03206 |
| October 30, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Butler |
| Sam A. Crow |
| David J. Waxse |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 39 is granted in part and denied in part as described fully in this Order. Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Decision on Summary Judgment 59 is denied. Plaintiff's Objection to Order of Magistrate Judge 60 is overruled and the court affirms Judge Sebelius's Order 55 . Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 08/30/18. Mailed to pro se party Kelly S. Tunnell by regular mail. (smnd)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER denying 48 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 51 Motion to Amend Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Gary Sebelius on 3/16/2018.Mailed to pro se party plaintiff Kelly S. Tunnell by regular mail. (wh)
|
|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ENTERED: Within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall show good cause, in writing, to Judge Crabtree as to why his case should not be dismissed. Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel 15 is denied without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Waxse on 07/28/17. Mailed to pro se party Kelly S. Tunnell by regular mail. (smnd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
