McLemore (ID 0102647) v. Saline County Sheriff's Office et al
| Jeffrey L. McLemore |
| Brenda Darr, Gary Fay and Amber Black |
| 5:2015cv03202 |
| August 24, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Topeka Office |
| Saline |
| Julie A. Robinson |
| David J. Waxse |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 78 Motion for Summary Judgment. This case is therefore dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Signed by Chief District Judge Julie A Robinson on 5/20/17. Mailed to pro se party Jeffrey L. McLemore by regular mail. (hw)
|
|
Filing
95
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 75 Motion for Reconsideration is denied; 78 Motion for Judgment is hereby converted to a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff shall file a reply, attaching any evidentiary support, by March 9, 2017, and Defendants may f ile a reply by March 9, 2017. The Clerk shall mail a copy of the "Notice to Pro Se Litigant Who Opposes a Motion for Summary Judgment" to Plaintiff pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 56.1(f), with a copy of this Order ; 92 Motion for Leave to File is moot. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 1/26/2017.Mailed Memorandum and Order and Rule 56.1(f) to pro se party Jeffrey L Mclemore by regular and certified mail ; Certified Tracking Number: 70150920000170458522 (ydm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
