Cheatham (ID 96193) v. ACH Medical Service et al
Ryan Cheatham |
ACH Medical Service, Melissa (lnu) and (fnu) Dedeke |
5:2015cv03211 |
August 31, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Topeka Office |
Leavenworth |
Carlos Murguia |
David J. Waxse |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 145 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denied as moot 97 Motion for Summary Judgment; denied as moot 97 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 99 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 123 Motion for Leave to File; denied as moot 125 Motion for Su mmary Judgment; denying 129 Motion for Reconsideration ; denied as moot 134 Motion to Stay Deadlines ; denied as moot 136 Motion for Order; denying 141 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 10/30/2017.Mailed to pro se party Ryan Cheatham by regular mail (ydm) |
Filing 124 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 89 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Sheriff Dedeke is dismissed as a party in this case. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 08/31/2017.Mailed to pro se party Ryan Cheatham by regular mail. (cv) |
Filing 96 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 79 Motion for Default Judgment; denying 84 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 07/19/2017.Mailed to pro se party Ryan Cheatham by regular mail. (cv) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.